home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1990-03-09 | 761 b | 23 lines | [TEXT/GEOL] |
- Item 1196647 5-March-90 02:47PST
-
- From: NAUTIL France - Dev, Nautil Info Lyon,IDV
-
- To: TURK Turkowski, Ken
- CPLUS.APPLE$ C++ Interest List--Apple Employees
- CPLUS.DEV$ C++ Interest List--Developers
-
- Sub: RE: Providing constructor
-
- Ken,
-
- Yes, a constructor is not necessary for the given sample. However, my real
- classes are much more complex and I think that constructors are suitable for
- readability.
- Why some classes could have constructors and other could not?
-
- (My answer is some late because I was not yet in the CPLUS.DEV$ list March 1st
- and I read your link on CPlus archives)
-
- Etienne Vautherin
-
-